• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Madalon Law

  • (877) IT-MATTERS
  • (954) 923-0072
  • Home
  • Legal Team
    • Joseph Madalon, Esq.
    • Leandro Carvalho, Esq.
    • Susan Lee, Esq.
  • Practice Areas
    • Property Damage
    • Hurricane Damage
    • Roof Damage
    • Water Damage
    • Amusement Park Accidents
    • Aviation Accidents
    • Bar / Nightclub Accidents
    • Bicycle Accidents
    • Birth Injury
    • Boating Accidents
    • Burn Injury
    • Bus Accidents
    • Car Accident
    • Construction Accidents
    • Head and Brain Injuries
    • Horse Riding Accident
    • Lyft Accident Attorneys
    • Maritime Attorneys
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Motorcycle Accidents
    • Negligent Security
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Pedestrian Accidents
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Slip and Fall
    • Spinal Injury
    • Swimming Pool Accident
    • Theme Park Injuries
    • Truck Accident
    • Uber Accident Attorneys
    • Vacation / Hotel Accident
    • Wrongful Death
    • Class Action Lawsuits
    • CPAP Recall Lawsuit
  • Results
  • Videos
  • Blog
    • Articles
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • En Español
  • Inicio
  • Nosotros
    • Equipo Legal
    • Biografia de Joseph Madalon
  • Lesiones Personales
  • Resultados
  • Videos en Español
  • Contacto
  • En inglés

How to Establish the Permanency of an Injury

Free Consultation - Call (888) 888-2535 - Madalon Law helps victims and their families receive compensation for their injuries in Injury Permanency and Vehicle Accident cases. How to Establish the Permanency of an Injury - Miami Injury Permanency Lawyer

Required Elements for Permanency of an Injury to Recover for Future ExpensesWald v. Grainger, 64 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 2011)

This accident occurred in Duval County Florida where the plaintiff, Howard Wald, sought to recover for damages he sustained when his vehicle was involved in an accident with Sam Gus Felos. Felos admitted fault for the accident. Wald claimed that he had sustained injuries to his neck, back right arm, foot and thigh as a result of the collision. Because Felos admitted that he was at fault for the accident the only issues the court had to decide were causation (whether the accident Felos was at fault for proximately caused Wald’s injuries) and the permanency of Wald’s injuries and damages.

At trial 2 doctors testified, one was Wald’s treating physician, Dr. Tan, who stated that Wald’s injuries to his neck, back and right elbow and thigh were permanent and connected with accident. Felos’ provided contrary testimony from Dr. Hogshead stating that Wald had not sustained permanent injuries to his neck and back from the accident and that Wald’s thigh numbness was giving him the benefit of the doubt that it was related to the accident. Wald requested that the court give the jury instructions to decide that his injuries were permanent. The court granted his request in part with regards to the permanency of Wald’s thigh injury but instructed the jury that they were free to decide what opinions they believed and made no reference to the permanency on any other injury in its jury instruction. The Jury returned with a verdict awarding Wald $1 million in damages.

On appeal the First District Court reversed the final judgment because the trial court erred by instructing the jury to regard Wald’s thigh injury as permanent because the decision of the injury’s permanency was up to the jury to decide and that based on its belief that Dr. Tan’s testimony was unclear on Wald’s thigh injury. The court also stated that the jury was free to reject any testimony regarding permanency including un-contradicted testimony.

The Florida Supreme Court granted review of Wald’s case and found that the First District’s assertions on permanency and the jury’s freedom to reject any undisputed testimony was inaccurate reflection of Florida law. The Supreme Court stated that generally permanency decisions are made by the jury however when there is evidence of injury and causation that allows for no reasonable conclusion to be drawn that could result in a decision for the defendant, a court can direct a jury to decide permanency in favor of the plaintiff. A plaintiff can establish a prima facie case of permanency by providing expert testimony of permanency. When this is done, the defendant bears the burden to present contrary expert testimony to severely contradict the Plaintiff’s expert or provide evidence that conflicts with the plaintiff’s evidence. If the defendant fails to do so the court can direct the jury to decide in favor of permanency.

The court stated that a trial court can direct a verdict in favor of permanency when it first determines whether the plaintiff’s evidence met the standard that supports their claim of permanent injury within a reasonable degree of medical probability. If it does then the court needs to look at the record to determine if any contrary evidence or inferences exists on the issue of permanent injury from which the jury could draw a conclusion in favor of the defendant. The jury can freely weigh the expert opinions, however when the medical evidence that supports permanence is undisputed, unimpeached or cannot be questioned based on contrary evidence then the jury cannot be allowed to simply ignore that evidence and decide in conflict with that evidence. The court concluded that because Wald’s thigh injury was indisputably permanent the trial court properly directed the jury to find for the Wald on that issue.

This case illustrates the standard for permanency and demonstrates a situation where the injured person will more likely than not receive damages for permanent injuries related to an accident. Medical testimony to establish your permanent injury is vital to establish your entitlement for compensation for future damages. If you have sustained an injury that you think is permanent you putting off a medical examination will break your case.

Contact the Fort Lauderdale accident attorneys of Madalon Law for a free consultation if you have questions pertaining to an accident you or a loved one may have been involved in.

Areas of Practice

Amusement Park Accidents

Aviation Accidents

Bar and Nightclub Fights

Bicycle Accidents

Birth Injury

Boating and Cruise Ship Accidents

Burn Injuries

Bus Accidents

Car Accidents

Construction Accidents

Head and Brain Injury

Horse Riding Accident

Maritime and Cruise Ship

Medical Malpractice

Motorcycle Accidents

Negligent and/or Inadequate Security

Nursing Home Abuse and/or Negligence

Pedestrian Accident

Premises Liability

Product Liability

Resort/Vacation Injuries

Sexual Harassment

Slip and Fall

Spinal Cord Injury

Swimming Pool Accidents

Theme Park Injuries

Truck Accidents

Wrongful Death

Video Library

Blog

Understanding the Law

Fort Lauderdale

Main Office
100 N. Federal Hwy #CU5
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954) 923-0072
Toll Free: (877) 486-2883
Fax: (954) 923-0074

West Palm Beach

By Appt. Only
515 N Flagler Dr Suite P-300
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-243-1003
Toll Free: (877) 486-2883
Fax: (954) 923-0074

Miami

By Appt. Only
150 SE 2nd Ave, Suite 300
Miami FL 33131
Phone: (786) 401-5059
Toll Free: (877) 486-2883
Fax: (954) 923-0074
  • Home
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map

Footer

Facebook

Twitter

Linkedin

Google Plus

YouTube

Instagram

Pinterest

We serve the following localities:
BROWARD COUNTY including Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, Pompano Beach, Plantation, Coral Springs, Davie, Sunrise, Weston, Deerfield Beach and Miramar;
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY including Coral Gables, Cutler Bay, Doral, Hialeah, Homestead, Kendall West, Miami, Tamiami, The Hammocks, and Westchester;
PALM BEACH COUNTY including Belle Glade, Lake Worth, and West Palm Beach;
ORANGE COUNTY including Orlando and Winter Park;
OSCEOLA COUNTY including Kissimmee, Poinciana, and St. Cloud.
Areas Served

Copyright © 2023 · Madalon Law · Powered by: USAttorneys.com
Areas Served

X

Contact Madalon Law

    Contact Us

    Please prove you are human by selecting the Car.