• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Madalon Law

  • (877) IT-MATTERS
  • (954) 923-0072
  • Home
  • Legal Team
    • Joseph Madalon, Esq.
    • Leandro Carvalho, Esq.
    • Susan Lee, Esq.
  • Practice Areas
    • Property Damage
    • Hurricane Damage
    • Roof Damage
    • Water Damage
    • Amusement Park Accidents
    • Aviation Accidents
    • Bar / Nightclub Accidents
    • Bicycle Accidents
    • Birth Injury
    • Boating Accidents
    • Burn Injury
    • Bus Accidents
    • Car Accident
    • Construction Accidents
    • Head and Brain Injuries
    • Horse Riding Accident
    • Lyft Accident Attorneys
    • Maritime Attorneys
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Motorcycle Accidents
    • Negligent Security
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Pedestrian Accidents
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Slip and Fall
    • Spinal Injury
    • Swimming Pool Accident
    • Theme Park Injuries
    • Truck Accident
    • Uber Accident Attorneys
    • Vacation / Hotel Accident
    • Wrongful Death
    • Class Action Lawsuits
    • CPAP Recall Lawsuit
  • Results
  • Videos
  • Blog
    • Articles
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • En Español
  • Inicio
  • Nosotros
    • Equipo Legal
    • Biografia de Joseph Madalon
  • Lesiones Personales
  • Resultados
  • Videos en Español
  • Contacto
  • En inglés

Rear-End Accidents – Comparative Negligence

Up until 1973, Florida handled recovery in tort claim actions using a system of contributory negligence. In that same year, the Florida Supreme Court heard and decided the case, ‘Hoffman’, which had an effect of replacing the existing system with a more “pure form”, referred to as comparative negligence. The court felt it was necessary to change how Florida handled tort claims, especially when it came to auto accidents, because the previously used system barred any recovery by a plaintiff if they were in any way responsible for their injuries, even minimally.

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE LAW

The holding by the Florida Supreme Court in the ‘Hoffman’ case in 1973, was a clear change in the substantive law that governed tort claims. What the court found was that denying plaintiffs any recovery in a personal injury claim based on their partial negligent conduct, seemed to be unfair.

If a plaintiff and a defendant both contributed to the cause of an injury, it made more sense to portion the liability between the parties, and allow for recovery of damages based on the other party’s contribution of fault. The area where the court saw a serious need for this change in the law was in that of auto accidents. The ruling in ‘Hoffman’ declared that tort claims involving auto accidents were “one of the most pressing social problems”, and a big reason for the change.

COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE VS. CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE

Before Florida used a system of Comparative Negligence, tort claims were all decided by a Contributory Negligence system. Much of the reason for which Florida felt that a change in systems was necessary, because, previously, any person who was at all negligent in causing their injury, was completely barred from receiving compensation from a party who was more at fault.

The Florida Supreme Court felt that eliminating a plaintiff’s ability for recovery all together if they had a hand in causing their injury was extremely harsh. Additionally, creating a new way of handling recovery in tort claims would provide a defendant a way to reduce the amount of damages that they were facing if a plaintiff was at all at fault for their injuries.

Comparative negligence would allow a jury to assign a percentage of Personal Injury liability to all parties to the lawsuit, and in turn, apportion an amount of damages to a plaintiff, minus what their percentage of negligence was in the act. The court felt that liability of an accident needed to be assigned based on a party’s contribution of fault to that accident.

COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE INVOLVING REAR-END AUTO ACCIDENTS

Auto accidents in Florida are governed by comparative negligence principles and elements of a negligence claim. In order for a person to be held liable for another person’s injuries in a rear-end collision, it must be shown there was a duty of care owed, there was a breach of duty, and that the person’s negligent act was the proximate and legal cause of the any damages. There are many factors that a jury, or court, will look at when deciding if someone is in fact the reason why another person has suffered the injuries they have.

Comparative negligence laws can be complex to follow and understand. If you have questions concerning a rear-end auto accident, and who is liable, contact Madalon Law today for your free consultation.

Areas of Practice

roller coaster ride with trees in foreground

Amusement Park Accidents

plane on runway getting ready for takeoff

Aviation Accidents

people drinking and dancing at a bar

Bar and Nightclub Fights

woman ready to get on a bicycle

Bicycle Accidents

emergency room sign at the entrance of hospital

Birth Injury

cruisde ship at dock

Boating and Cruise Ship Accidents

fire burning and burned skin

Burn Injuries

school bus picking up kids at bus stop

Bus Accidents

two cars in car crash at intersection

Car Accidents

constuction worker that got hurt working on job site

Construction Accidents

woman with head injury from a car accident

Head and Brain Injury

person riding a horse

Horse Riding Accident

cruise ship sailing on the sea

Maritime and Cruise Ship

medical professional with stethascope helping a patient

Medical Malpractice

motorcycle accidient with rider on the ground with injury

Motorcycle Accidents

security personnel at a concert

Negligent and/or Inadequate Security

nursing home patient laying in bed

Nursing Home Abuse and/or Negligence

man injured on ground from car that went through intersection

Pedestrian Accident

broken fence and cracked sidewalk

Premises Liability

sign wih the word defective spelled out

Product Liability

beach and palm trees at a vacation resort

Resort/Vacation Injuries

womans hands pushing away a man that is grabbing her

Sexual Harassment

yellow caution sign on floor with a person that slipped on the floor next to it

Slip and Fall

medical image of body and spine

Spinal Cord Injury

swimming pool with people jumping in the water

Swimming Pool Accidents

sign of walt disney world theme park entrance

Theme Park Injuries

semi truck driving on road

Truck Accidents

lady justice statue

Wrongful Death

Video Library

Blog

Understanding the Law

Fort Lauderdale

Main Office
100 N. Federal Hwy #CU5
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Map for Fort Lauderdale address
Phone: (954) 923-0072
Toll Free: (877) 486-2883
Fax: (954) 923-0074

West Palm Beach

By Appt. Only
515 N Flagler Dr Suite P-300
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Map for West Palm Beach address
Phone: (561)-243-1003
Toll Free: (877) 486-2883
Fax: (954) 923-0074

Miami

By Appt. Only
150 SE 2nd Ave, Suite 300
Miami FL 33131
Map for Miami address
Phone: (786) 401-5059
Toll Free: (877) 486-2883
Fax: (954) 923-0074
  • Home
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map

Footer

Facebook

Twitter

Linkedin

Google Plus

YouTube

Instagram

Pinterest

We serve the following localities:
BROWARD COUNTY including Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, Pompano Beach, Plantation, Coral Springs, Davie, Sunrise, Weston, Deerfield Beach and Miramar;
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY including Coral Gables, Cutler Bay, Doral, Hialeah, Homestead, Kendall West, Miami, Tamiami, The Hammocks, and Westchester;
PALM BEACH COUNTY including Belle Glade, Lake Worth, and West Palm Beach;
ORANGE COUNTY including Orlando and Winter Park;
OSCEOLA COUNTY including Kissimmee, Poinciana, and St. Cloud.
Areas Served

Copyright © 2023 · Madalon Law · Powered by: USAttorneys.com
Areas Served

X

Contact Madalon Law

    Contact Us

    Please prove you are human by selecting the truck.