• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Madalon Law

  • (877) IT-MATTERS
  • (954) 923-0072
  • Home
  • Legal Team
    • Joseph Madalon, Esq.
    • Leandro Carvalho, Esq.
    • Susan Lee, Esq.
  • Practice Areas
    • Property Damage
    • Hurricane Damage
    • Roof Damage
    • Water Damage
    • Amusement Park Accidents
    • Aviation Accidents
    • Bar / Nightclub Accidents
    • Bicycle Accidents
    • Birth Injury
    • Boating Accidents
    • Burn Injury
    • Bus Accidents
    • Car Accident
    • Construction Accidents
    • Head and Brain Injuries
    • Horse Riding Accident
    • Lyft Accident Attorneys
    • Maritime Attorneys
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Motorcycle Accidents
    • Negligent Security
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Pedestrian Accidents
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Slip and Fall
    • Spinal Injury
    • Swimming Pool Accident
    • Theme Park Injuries
    • Truck Accident
    • Uber Accident Attorneys
    • Vacation / Hotel Accident
    • Wrongful Death
    • Class Action Lawsuits
    • CPAP Recall Lawsuit
  • Results
  • Videos
  • Blog
    • Articles
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • En Español
  • Inicio
  • Nosotros
    • Equipo Legal
    • Biografia de Joseph Madalon
  • Lesiones Personales
  • Resultados
  • Videos en Español
  • Contacto
  • En inglés

The Importance of Medical Treatment Can Effect the Compensation after an Accident

Free Consultation - Call (888) 888-2535 - Madalon Law helps victims and their families receive compensation for their injuries in Accident and Injury cases. The Importance of Medical Treatment Can Effect the Compensation after an Accident - Miami Accident Lawyer

Pugliese v. Terek, 3D11-2209, 2013 WL 3455605 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. July 10, 2013)

This auto accident case dealt with the reasonableness of medical treatment and costs after a collision. Though the liability of the accident in this case was not an issue, the defendant in the lawsuit was seeking to have the total amount of damages lessened due to them being unreasonable.

At trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff, Charles Terek, damages for past medical treatment, as well as needed treatment in his future. The award also provided the plaintiff compensation for pain and suffering. There was not dispute at the trial as to liability of this 2004 auto accident. It was also not contested that a surgical procedure that the plaintiff underwent in 2006 was needed. The problem that the defendant in this lawsuit presented to the court was the amount for the surgery seemed excessive, and that a second surgery that took place in 2009 was necessary due to the accident that took place nearly five years earlier. Additionally, the costs that were incurred because of the second procedure were also in question by the defendant.

As far as the need for the second, 2009 surgery, the defendant presented evidence at trial that the plaintiff treated previously for injuries to his back and right leg from the 2004 auto accident. Medical documentation established that the plaintiff suffered a herniated disc because of the collision. In 2006, the plaintiff underwent a surgical procedure to repair the injury, and eventually was declared by to have reached maximum medical improvement by several doctors.

Almost two years later, in 2008, the plaintiff began to complain radiating pain down his left leg. Diagnostic testing revealed that there were new herniated discs as well as compression fractures to the plaintiff’s spine. As indicated by doctors for both the plaintiff and defendant, these injuries were not document on the MRI that was done previously. Per recommendations by the plaintiff’s physician, a second surgical procedure was performed in 2009, and the plaintiff claimed in this lawsuit that those injuries came from the accident that occurred in 2004. Both surgeries combined had expenses associated with them in excess of three hundred and forty thousand dollars.

The defendant claimed at trial that the new injuries, herniated discs and compression fractures, were not discovered on the diagnostic testing performed on the plaintiff in 2004. Therefore, it was the defenses’ contention that the additional injuries had to have been caused by something other than the auto accident. If the injuries that caused the need for the 2009 surgery had nothing to do with the 2004 auto accident, then, the defendant argued, he should not be held responsible for the bill, which exceeded two hundred thousand dollars. There was also evidence presented to the jury that the bill for the 2006 surgical procedure was unreasonable.

After both sides were done presenting their cases, a jury awarded the plaintiff a judgment for nearly one hundred and seventy thousand dollars. The importance of making medical professionals aware of any and all possible injuries after an auto accident is extremely crucial. A gap in treatment for an injury can significantly change the amount of money a jury awards a plaintiff. In this case, the initial MRI did not show the same injuries that were demonstrated in the second MRI taken four years later. If the plaintiff had indicated they felt pain in that region sooner, and the MRI and detection of the new injuries were done earlier, the final judgment could have been dramatically different. If you have been involved in a car accident, contact the Fort Lauderdale accident lawyers of Madalon Law for a free consultation.

Areas of Practice

Amusement Park Accidents

Aviation Accidents

Bar and Nightclub Fights

Bicycle Accidents

Birth Injury

Boating and Cruise Ship Accidents

Burn Injuries

Bus Accidents

Car Accidents

Construction Accidents

Head and Brain Injury

Horse Riding Accident

Maritime and Cruise Ship

Medical Malpractice

Motorcycle Accidents

Negligent and/or Inadequate Security

Nursing Home Abuse and/or Negligence

Pedestrian Accident

Premises Liability

Product Liability

Resort/Vacation Injuries

Sexual Harassment

Slip and Fall

Spinal Cord Injury

Swimming Pool Accidents

Theme Park Injuries

Truck Accidents

Wrongful Death

Video Library

Blog

Understanding the Law

Fort Lauderdale

Main Office
100 N. Federal Hwy #CU5
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954) 923-0072
Toll Free: (877) 486-2883
Fax: (954) 923-0074

West Palm Beach

By Appt. Only
515 N Flagler Dr Suite P-300
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-243-1003
Toll Free: (877) 486-2883
Fax: (954) 923-0074

Miami

By Appt. Only
150 SE 2nd Ave, Suite 300
Miami FL 33131
Phone: (786) 401-5059
Toll Free: (877) 486-2883
Fax: (954) 923-0074
  • Home
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map

Footer

Facebook

Twitter

Linkedin

Google Plus

YouTube

Instagram

Pinterest

We serve the following localities:
BROWARD COUNTY including Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, Pompano Beach, Plantation, Coral Springs, Davie, Sunrise, Weston, Deerfield Beach and Miramar;
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY including Coral Gables, Cutler Bay, Doral, Hialeah, Homestead, Kendall West, Miami, Tamiami, The Hammocks, and Westchester;
PALM BEACH COUNTY including Belle Glade, Lake Worth, and West Palm Beach;
ORANGE COUNTY including Orlando and Winter Park;
OSCEOLA COUNTY including Kissimmee, Poinciana, and St. Cloud.
Areas Served

Copyright © 2023 · Madalon Law · Powered by: USAttorneys.com
Areas Served

X

Contact Madalon Law

    Contact Us

    Please prove you are human by selecting the Key.